Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism and Research Integrity Policy

Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society is committed to maintaining originality, transparency, academic integrity, and responsible scholarly communication. Manuscripts submitted to Athena may be screened for text similarity and other indicators of research-integrity concerns before or during the editorial and peer-review process.

Plagiarism, inappropriate text reuse, fabricated or falsified research, citation manipulation, and other forms of research misconduct are inconsistent with Athena's publication standards and may result in editorial action in accordance with the journal's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.

1. DEFINITION OF PLAGIARISM

Plagiarism occurs when an author presents another person's words, ideas, data, arguments, images, results, creative material, or intellectual contribution as their own without appropriate acknowledgment, citation, quotation, or permission where permission is legally required.

Plagiarism may occur intentionally or through inadequate scholarly attribution. Authors are responsible for ensuring that all sources are accurately identified and appropriately acknowledged.

2. PLAGIARISM INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO
  • Direct Plagiarism: Copying text verbatim from another source without appropriate quotation and citation.
  • Paraphrasing Without Attribution: Rewriting or summarizing another person's ideas, arguments, interpretations, or findings without acknowledging the original source.
  • Mosaic or Patchwork Plagiarism: Combining phrases, sentences, or ideas from one or more sources with minor modification while failing to provide appropriate acknowledgment.
  • Unattributed Ideas: Presenting theories, concepts, arguments, interpretations, or intellectual contributions originating from another person as if they were the author's own.
  • Improper Use of Data: Reproducing another researcher's datasets, findings, statistics, or analytical results without appropriate citation, acknowledgment, authorization, or licensing.
  • Improper Use of Figures and Other Materials: Reproducing images, photographs, charts, tables, maps, illustrations, questionnaires, instruments, or other protected material without appropriate attribution and permission where required.
  • Quotation Misrepresentation: Reproducing directly quoted material without quotation marks, block-quotation formatting, or equivalent indication that the words originated from another source.
  • Source Misrepresentation: Providing an inaccurate or misleading citation that conceals or misrepresents the actual origin of material.
  • Unauthorized Authorship or Contract Cheating: Submitting work substantially produced by another person as the author's own scholarly work without appropriate acknowledgment or legitimate authorship attribution.
  • Inappropriate Text Recycling: Reusing substantial portions of an author's own previously published material without appropriate citation, disclosure, or justification.
3. TEXT RECYCLING AND REDUNDANT PUBLICATION

Authors must appropriately disclose and cite their own previously published work when it is reused in a new manuscript. Substantial duplication of previously published material may constitute inappropriate text recycling or redundant publication.

Limited overlap may sometimes be legitimate, particularly for standardized methodological descriptions, but editors will assess the amount, location, context, attribution, necessity, and scholarly significance of the duplicated material.

4. SIMILARITY AND PLAGIARISM SCREENING

Manuscripts submitted to Athena are subject to editorial screening for originality. The journal may use Turnitin and Plagiarism Checker X as text-similarity screening tools.

Important: A similarity percentage is a screening indicator and does not by itself establish whether plagiarism has occurred.

Similarity reports are reviewed by an editor or authorized editorial staff member. The assessment considers the source, amount, location, nature, attribution, and context of matching material rather than relying solely on an overall numerical similarity score.

Bibliographies, correctly quoted text, commonly used terminology, standardized methodological statements, institutional names, legitimate prior-publication references, and other appropriate matches may contribute to a similarity score without constituting plagiarism.

Similarity Indicator

As an editorial screening guideline, Athena normally expects manuscripts to demonstrate a low overall level of textual similarity. A similarity result of approximately 15% or higher may trigger additional editorial examination.

This percentage is not an automatic rejection threshold. A manuscript below 15% may still contain plagiarism or other unacceptable duplication, while a manuscript above 15% may contain legitimate and properly attributed similarities. Final assessment is based on human editorial evaluation of the similarity report.

6. OTHER FORMS OF RESEARCH MISCONDUCT

Some integrity violations are not technically plagiarism but are nevertheless serious forms of research or publication misconduct. These include:

  • fabrication of research data or results;
  • falsification or inappropriate manipulation of data;
  • manipulation or duplication of figures or images;
  • fabrication or falsification of references and DOIs;
  • citation manipulation;
  • undisclosed duplicate or redundant publication;
  • inappropriate authorship practices;
  • manipulation of the peer-review process; and
  • deliberate misrepresentation of research methods, ethical approval, participants, findings, or sources.

Such matters are handled according to Athena's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement and applicable publication-ethics guidance.

7. EDITORIAL SCREENING PROCEDURE
1. Screening
The manuscript is screened using appropriate similarity or integrity-checking tools.
2. Human Assessment
An editor evaluates relevant matched passages and their sources.
3. Clarification
Authors may be asked to explain, correct, cite, rewrite, or provide supporting documentation.
4. Editorial Decision
Appropriate editorial action is determined according to the nature and seriousness of the concern.
8. ACTION BEFORE PUBLICATION

Where a similarity or integrity concern is identified before publication, the journal may take one or more of the following actions depending on the seriousness of the issue:

  • request clarification from the author(s);
  • request correction of citations or attribution;
  • require rewriting or revision of overlapping material;
  • request supporting data, permissions, or documentation;
  • suspend editorial evaluation while a concern is examined;
  • reject the manuscript where substantial plagiarism, duplication, fabrication, falsification, or other serious misconduct is established.
9. ACTION AFTER PUBLICATION

Concerns regarding plagiarism or research integrity may be investigated even after an article has been published.

Depending on the evidence and seriousness of the matter, appropriate post-publication action may include:

  • publication of a correction or corrigendum;
  • publication of an expression of concern while an investigation remains unresolved;
  • retraction of the article where the published record is substantially unreliable or serious misconduct is established;
  • notification of relevant institutions or responsible authorities where appropriate; or
  • other proportionate action necessary to protect the integrity of the scholarly record.

Automated Screening and Human Oversight

Similarity-detection software and other automated research-integrity tools assist the editorial process but do not independently determine whether misconduct has occurred.

Final evaluation of suspected plagiarism, inappropriate text reuse, fabricated references, AI-related integrity concerns, or other potential misconduct remains the responsibility of qualified editors exercising human judgment.

Screening Policy Summary

Plagiarism Screening Yes
Screening Tools Turnitin and Plagiarism Checker X
Similarity Indicator Approximately 15% may trigger additional review
Automatic Rejection Based on Percentage No
Final Assessment Human Editorial Evaluation
Commitment to Academic Integrity: Athena evaluates plagiarism and similarity concerns on the basis of evidence and context rather than an automated percentage alone. Automated screening tools support, but do not replace, human editorial judgment. Confirmed cases of plagiarism or research misconduct are addressed proportionately in order to protect authors, readers, reviewers, and the integrity of the scholarly record.