Teacher–Student Conflicts: Conflict Proneness, Perceived Causes, and An Empirical Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v4i4.773Keywords:
Teacher–Student Conflict, Conflict Proneness, Teacher–Student Relationship, Psychological Safety, Conflict Management CompetenceAbstract
Teacher–student relationships constitute one of the most influential determinants of students’ academic achievement, psychological well-being, and social adjustment. Conflicts emerging within these relationships may either hinder educational outcomes or serve as constructive opportunities for personal and academic development, depending on how they are managed. This study investigates the socio-psychological characteristics of teacher–student conflicts by integrating theoretical analysis with empirical evidence. Specifically, it examines students’ conflict proneness, perceived causes of teacher–student conflicts, and the relationship between conflict proneness and the quality of teacher–student relationships. Data were collected from 410 secondary school students (Grades 8–11) using N. V. Grishina’s Conflict Situation Diagnostics methodology. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis were employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed that most participants demonstrated a moderate level of conflict proneness (56.8%), whereas 22.2% exhibited high conflict proneness. Communication barriers and mutual misunderstanding (34.9%), perceived unfairness in assessment (23.9%), and disagreements concerning disciplinary requirements (18.5%) emerged as the most frequently reported sources of conflict. Furthermore, a statistically significant negative correlation was identified between conflict proneness and the quality of teacher–student relationships (r = –0.52, p < .01). The findings emphasize the importance of strengthening teachers’ conflict management competence, empathic communication skills, and psychologically safe learning environments to foster constructive educational relationships.
References
Emslander V, Holzberger D, Ofstad SB, Fischbach A, Scherer R. Teacher–student relationships and student outcomes: A systematic second-order meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2025;151(3):365–397. doi:10.1037/bul0000461.
Erkinov MM. Nizoli xulq-atvor tushunchasining pedagogik va psixologik asoslari. Fan va innovatsiya yangiliklari xalqaro ilmiy-metodik jurnali. 2026;(1):116–123.
Göktaş E, Kaya M. The effects of teacher relationships on student academic achievement: A second-order meta-analysis. Participatory Educational Research. 2023.
Keane K, Evans RR, Orihuela CA, Mrug S. Teacher–student relationships, stress, and psychosocial functioning during early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools. 2023;60:5124–5144. doi:10.1002/pits.23020.
Xie R, Jiang J, Yue L, Ye L, An D, Liu Y. Under psychological safety climate: The beneficial effects of teacher–student conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(15):9300. doi:10.3390/ijerph19159300.
Drugli MB, Lekhal R, Solheim E, et al. Reciprocal relations between conflicted student–teacher relationships and children's behavior problems: Within-person analyses from Norway and the USA. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2023;52:379–393.
Tashpo'latova MA. Ta'lim jarayonida pedagogik nizolar va ularni hal etishning psixologik mexanizmlari. Psixologiya. 2021;(3):45–52.
Vallone F, Dell'Aquila E, Dolce P, Marocco D, Zurlo MC. Teachers' multicultural personality traits as predictors of intercultural conflict management styles: Evidence from five European countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2022;87:51–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.01.006.
Wang MT, Degol JL. School climate and educational outcomes: Contemporary perspectives. Educational Psychology Review. 2020.
Zañartu N, Pérez-Salas CP. Teacher–student relationship and students with special educational needs. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14.
Wang MT, Dishion TJ. Associations between teacher–student relationship and externalizing problem behaviors among Chinese rural adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14.
Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978.
Leontiev AN. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1978.
Rogers CR. On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1961.
Grishina NV. Psychology of Conflict. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erkinov Muslimbek Mo'yiddin o'g'li

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








