Reviewers

PEER REVIEW COMMUNITY

Reviewers

The reviewers of SAGA: Journal of Technology and Information Systems contribute their scholarly expertise to support the journal's double-blind peer-review process and maintain the quality, integrity, and academic relevance of published research.

REVIEWER DIRECTORY

Reviewer selection is based on relevant academic expertise, research experience, and suitability to the subject area of submitted manuscripts.

The inclusion of reviewer names in this directory does not disclose which manuscripts they have reviewed. Reviewer identities remain confidential in relation to individual submissions under the journal's double-blind peer-review policy.

Dr. Ir. Nur Widiyasono, M.Kom.
Universitas Siliwangi, Indonesia
SCOPUS SINTA Google Scholar ORCID
Muhammad Dicky Syahputra Lubis, S.T., M.Kom.
Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien, Indonesia
SCOPUS SINTA Google Scholar ORCID
Dr. Djoko Pitoyo, S.T., M.Sc.
Universitas Sangga Buana, Indonesia
SCOPUS SINTA Google Scholar ORCID
Dr. Yo Ceng Giap, M.Kom.
Universitas Buddhi Dharma, Indonesia
SCOPUS SINTA Google Scholar ORCID
Dr. I Nyoman Bagus Pramartha, S.Pd., M.Pd.
ITB STIKOM Bali, Indonesia
SCOPUS SINTA Google Scholar ORCID
Dr. Mohamad Ilyas Abas, M.Kom.
Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo, Indonesia
SCOPUS SINTA Google Scholar ORCID
Gouri Sankar Bhunia, Ph.D., M.Phil.
VassarLabs IT Solution Pvt. Ltd., India
SCOPUS Google Scholar ORCID
Sunariya Utama
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
SCOPUS Google Scholar ORCID
Dr. Usanto S., S.Kom., M.Kom.
Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Swadharma, Indonesia
SCOPUS ORCID
Alwendi
Universitas Graha Nusantara, Indonesia
SCOPUS Google Scholar
Aryo De Wibowo Muhammad Sidik
Nusa Putra University, Indonesia
SCOPUS Google Scholar
Hanson Prihantoro Putro
Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
SCOPUS Google Scholar
Bambang Suprayogi, S.E., M.Si., CNA.
Politeknik LP3I, Indonesia
SINTA Google Scholar
✓
Double-Blind Peer Review

SAGA applies a double-blind peer-review model. Authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other during the review process. Research articles are normally evaluated by at least two independent reviewers.