Determining the Best Web Designer Using the SMARTER Method (Case Study: Website Development Service Provider)

Authors

  • Lintang Patria Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
  • Bernad J. D. Sitompul Fakultas Teknik, Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia
  • Nasib Marbun Teknologi Rekayasa Komputer Grafis, Politeknik Cendana, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/saga.v2i3.286

Keywords:

Decision Support System, SMARTER, Web Designer

Abstract

This research aims to solve the problem of determining the best Web Designer objectively for website development service business activists. In this research, the author offers SMARTER as a decision support system method to produce a ranking of the best Web Designer alternatives to be selected by decision makers. The alternatives selected as the best Web Designer in this study consist of 5 candidates (AX1, AX2, AX3, AX4, and AX5). The criteria used in the process of determining the best Web Designer in this study are communication, ability to design websites, discipline, and loyalty. The results of the application of the SMARTER method in this study recommend alternative AX3 to the decision maker to be selected as the best web designer who is entitled to a reward

References

Situmorang L, Sagala JR. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Tentor Terbaik Dengan Metode Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis). Jurnal Nasional Komputasi Dan Teknologi Informasi (JNKTI) 2020;3(3):209–214. https://doi.org/10.32672/jnkti.v3i3.2418.

Susanto A, Wahid O, Hazriani, Yuyun. Decision support system on quality assessment of the prospective civil servant’s education and training using fuzzy method. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 2021;24(1):519–529. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v24.i1.pp519-529.

Siregar BH, Helmiah F, Kifti WM. Implementasi Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process ( MFEP ) Pada Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Kelurahan di Kecamatan 2022;4(1):28–37. https://doi.org/10.47065/bits.v4i1.1479.

Zalmi WF, Sitompul BJD, Nduru SW, Kayan S. Welder Recruitment Decision Support System Using the SMARTER Method 2023;1(2):44–49. https://doi.org/10.58905/SAGA.vol1i2.98.

Marbun N, Pozilova SK, Shahadi HI, Ghosh A. Application of Preference Selection Index in Recruitment of Search Engine Optimization Specialist. SAGA: Journal of Technology and Information System 2024;1(4):144–151. https://doi.org/10.58905/saga.v1i4.241.

Wahyu RF, Rohayani H, Ardhana VYP, Frieyadie F, Supriyatna A, Desyanti D. Kombinasi Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Kasir. Bulletin of Informatics and Data Science 2023;2(1):30. https://doi.org/10.61944/bids.v2i1.61.

Affandi RD, Pratiwi H, Azahari, Ibnu Sa’ad M. Application of the SMARTER Method in Determining the Whitening of Study Permits and Teacher Study Tasks. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT) 2023;5(2):315–325. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i2.311.

Sunardi, Rusydi Umar, Sahara D. Best Employee Decision Using Multi Attribute Utility Theory Method. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi) 2022;6(6):945–951. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v6i6.4318.

Ran H. MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under single-valued neutrosophic sets and applications to performance evaluation of sustainable microfinance groups lending. PLoS ONE 2023;18(1 January):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280239.

Haji M, Kerbache L, Al-Ansari T. Evaluating the Performance of a Safe Insulin Supply Chain Using the AHP-TOPSIS Approach. Processes 2022;10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112203.

Alam Bhuiyan MM, Hammad A. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Selecting the Most Sustainable Structural Material for a Multistory Building Construction. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023;15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043128.

Utomo DP, Purba B. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Tenaga Kependidikan (TENDIK) Dengan Menggunakan Metode SMARTER. Jurnal Komtika (Komputasi Dan Informatika) 2021;5(2):140–152. https://doi.org/10.31603/komtika.v5i2.5619.

NASUTION WSL, Patriot Nusa. Decision Support System for Election of OSIS Chair for Muhammadiyah Schools Using the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank (SMARTER) Method. Data Science: Journal of Computing and Applied Informatics 2022;6(2):96–110. https://doi.org/10.32734/jocai.v6.i2-9071.

Khairunnisa, Fahlevi MR. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kelompok Nelayan Penerima Bantuan Menggunakan Metode SMARTER Decision Support System for Selection of Recipient Fishermen Groups using the SMARTER Method. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem 2023;1(Mei):776.

Arif M, Suseno JE, Isnanto RR. Multi-Criteria Decision Making with the VIKOR and SMARTER Methods for Optimal Seller Selection from Several E-Marketplaces. E3S Web of Conferences 2020;202:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020214002.

Rahmad J, Sihombing V, Masrizal M. Implementasi Metode SMARTER Untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Bantuan Raskin Masa Covid 19. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma 2021;5(2):549. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i2.2914.

Sipayung ES, Purba B. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Atlet Pusat Pendidikan dan Latihan Pelajar (PPLP) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Smarter. KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional … 2020;4:133–138. https://doi.org/10.30865/komik.v4i1.2655.

Wiranwan Galeh Pradhana AYC. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Diskon Asuransi Dengan Metode Smarter. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis 2021;3(2):431–441. https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v3i2.299.

Rahmad J, Sihombing V. Implementasi Metode SMARTER Untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Bantuan Raskin Masa Covid 19 2021;5(April):549–555. https://doi.org/10.30865/mib.v5i2.2914.

Elizabeth T, Tinaliah T. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Point Tambahan Perkuliahan Menggunakan Metode SMARTER. JATISI : Jurnal Teknik Informatika Dan Sistem Informasi 2023;10(2):741–754.

Downloads

Published

03-12-2024