Correction & Retraction Policies

Corrections, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern Policy

Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business is committed to maintaining the accuracy, integrity, reliability, and completeness of the scholarly record. When concerns are identified in a published article, the journal will take appropriate editorial action according to the nature and severity of the issue.

Editorial actions may include the publication of a Correction, Expression of Concern, or Retraction.

The journal considers such cases in accordance with recognized principles of publication ethics and the COPE Retraction Guidelines .

1. Corrections

A correction may be published when an error or omission is identified after publication but does not invalidate the principal findings or overall conclusions of the article.

Examples may include:

  • Errors in author names or affiliations;
  • Incorrect or incomplete funding information;
  • Errors in tables, figures, captions, or supplementary information;
  • Minor numerical or typographical errors that affect interpretation;
  • Incorrect information that requires clarification; or
  • Other errors that should be formally corrected to maintain an accurate scholarly record.

The correction notice should clearly identify the original article and explain the nature of the correction. Where appropriate, the published article may also be updated with a clear indication that a correction has been issued.

2. Expression of Concern

An Expression of Concern may be issued when substantial concerns have been raised regarding a published article but the available evidence is not yet sufficient to determine whether a correction or retraction is required.

This may occur when:

  • There are unresolved concerns regarding the reliability or integrity of the research;
  • There are allegations of research or publication misconduct that require further investigation;
  • An institutional or other formal investigation is ongoing;
  • The available evidence is inconclusive or disputed; or
  • A final resolution cannot reasonably be reached within a short period.

An Expression of Concern is intended to alert readers to potentially significant issues while an appropriate investigation or assessment is ongoing.

3. Retraction

Retraction is considered when there is clear evidence that a published article contains serious problems that substantially undermine the reliability, validity, originality, or ethical acceptability of the work.

An article may be considered for retraction when, for example:

  • There is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable as a result of fabrication, falsification, serious methodological error, miscalculation, experimental error, or other significant problems;
  • The article contains substantial plagiarism;
  • The findings or substantial parts of the article have previously been published elsewhere without appropriate disclosure, justification, permission, or cross-reference, constituting redundant or duplicate publication;
  • The article reports research that was conducted unethically;
  • There is evidence of serious manipulation of the peer-review, authorship, citation, or publication process;
  • There is evidence that data, images, participants, references, or other essential research materials were fabricated or falsified;
  • Required authorization, ethical approval, or informed consent was absent where such approval or consent was necessary and the issue materially affects the legitimacy of the research; or
  • Other serious publication-ethics violations make continued reliance on the article inappropriate.

4. Retraction Due to Misconduct or Honest Error

Retraction is intended primarily to correct the scholarly record and alert readers that the findings of an article should no longer be relied upon. It is not solely a mechanism for sanctioning authors.

Accordingly, an article may require retraction because of either research or publication misconduct or a significant honest error when the problem makes the principal findings or conclusions unreliable.

5. Editorial Assessment and Investigation

Concerns regarding a published article may be raised by authors, readers, reviewers, editors, institutions, publishers, or other parties.

When a credible concern is received, the journal will assess the available information and may request an explanation or supporting documentation from the author(s).

Depending on the nature of the case, the journal may:

  • Review the manuscript and publication history;
  • Examine relevant similarity reports, data, figures, references, or supplementary materials;
  • Request clarification or original supporting information from the author(s);
  • Consult members of the Editorial Board or independent experts;
  • Contact relevant institutions or other journals when appropriate; and
  • Take other reasonable steps necessary to establish the facts of the case.

Authors will normally be given an opportunity to respond to substantive concerns before a final editorial action is taken, except where immediate action is necessary to protect readers or the integrity of the scholarly record.

6. Retraction Notice

When an article is retracted, Apollo: Journal of Tourism and Business will publish a retraction notice that is clearly associated with the affected article.

The retraction notice should, where appropriate:

  • Clearly identify the retracted article;
  • State that the article has been retracted;
  • Explain the reason for the retraction sufficiently to inform readers;
  • Identify who initiated or agreed to the retraction where appropriate;
  • Distinguish between misconduct and honest error where the available evidence permits; and
  • Remain freely accessible as part of the permanent scholarly record.

7. Treatment of Retracted Articles

A retracted article will normally remain part of the published scholarly record rather than being deleted from the journal website.

The article and its landing page should be clearly identified as RETRACTED and linked to the corresponding retraction notice so that readers can readily understand its status.

The journal will seek to preserve the bibliographic record, article DOI, publication history, and retraction information to maintain transparency and the integrity of the scholarly record.

8. Article Removal

Complete removal of published content is expected to occur only in exceptional circumstances where continued public availability presents serious legal, privacy, safety, or other compelling concerns.

Where removal is necessary, the journal should preserve an appropriate bibliographic record or notice explaining that the content has been removed, except where legal or other overriding requirements prevent such disclosure.

9. Author Requests After Publication

Authors may inform the journal of errors or serious concerns discovered after publication. A request from an author does not automatically result in retraction or removal.

The editorial team will determine the appropriate action based on the nature and significance of the issue and its effect on the reliability and integrity of the published record.

10. Publication and Metadata

Corrections, Expressions of Concern, and Retraction Notices should be published as clearly identifiable editorial notices and linked to the affected article whenever technically possible.

The journal will make reasonable efforts to ensure that the status of affected articles is clearly communicated through the journal website and relevant publication metadata.

11. Publication Ethics Framework

The journal's handling of corrections, Expressions of Concern, and retractions is informed by recognized publication-ethics principles, including the COPE Retraction Guidelines .

Each case is assessed individually according to the available evidence, the seriousness of the issue, and the need to maintain an accurate and trustworthy scholarly record.

Post-Publication Editorial Actions
  • Minor or correctable error: Correction
  • Serious but unresolved concern: Expression of Concern
  • Findings are substantially unreliable or serious misconduct is established: Retraction
  • Retracted article: Normally retained and clearly marked as retracted
  • Complete article removal: Reserved for exceptional circumstances
  • Ethical framework: COPE Retraction Guidelines and applicable journal policies