The Effect of Public Shareholding and Environmental Costs on Low Carbon Economy Disclosure: The Mediating Role of Green Initiatives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/apollo.v5i1.760Keywords:
Public Shareholding, Environmental Costs, Green Initiatives, Low Carbon Economy Disclosure, Sustainability AccountingAbstract
This paper examines how public equity allocation and environmental expenditure influence corporate Low Carbon Economy Disclosure (LCED), emphasizing the intervening role of green initiatives. Drawing upon Stakeholder and Legitimacy theories, we analyze environmentally sensitive Indonesian listed firms—spanning manufacturing, mining, energy, plantation, and utility sectors—participating in the PROPER program from 2021 through 2024. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) on a purposively selected panel dataset, we evaluate both direct structural paths and indirect mediation mechanisms. The statistical output demonstrates that direct public equity participation exhibits a significant negative association with LCED, whereas environmental costs display a non-significant direct effect. Crucially, mediation analysis reveals that green initiatives successfully bridge public shareholding to heightened low-carbon disclosure quality yet fail to mediate the path from environmental expenditure to LCED. Methodological robustness tests, including out-of-sample predictive evaluations () and discriminant validity checks (HTMT), confirm the empirical stability of the structural relationships. These results indicate that internal environmental programs serve as a pivotal operational bridge translating market ownership pressures into transparent corporate reporting. Consequently, corporate leaders must shift from passive regulatory compliance toward active, sustainability-driven programs to advance Net Zero Emission goals and elevate ESG reporting standards.
References
R. W. and L. T. Q. Zhang, “Corporate incentives for carbon disclosure under cli-mate transition risks: Evidence from emerging capital markets,” Journal of Interna-tional Financial Management & Accounting, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 45–72, 2024.
T. A.-M. and S. K. A. R. M. A. Hasan, “Institutional pressure and corporate climate strategy disclosure: A global perspective,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1420–1448, 2023.
G. M. and D. M. P. C. H. Cho, “Legitimacy theory in corporate environmental reporting: A critical evaluation and contemporary update,” Accounting, Organiza-tions and Society, vol. 98, p. 101311, 2022.
C. Deegan, “Twenty years of legitimising effect in corporate environmental report-ing: Progress and future theoretical developments,” Accounting, Auditing & Ac-countability Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 410–438, 2023.
F. M. A.-E. and V. A. M. G. I. M. Garcia-Sanchez, “Determinants of low-carbon economy disclosure quality: Stakeholder power vs. managerial opportunistic be-havior,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 312, p. 127712, 2021.
L. , A. A. , H. S. , & Y. Y. Fuadah, “The ownership structure, and the Environmen-tal, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure, firm value and firm performance: The audit committee as moderating variable,” Economies, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 314, 2022.
M. J. and P. A. B. J. F. Henri, “Eco-control systems and carbon accounting perfor-mance in environmentally sensitive industries,” Accounting, Organizations and So-ciety,” vol. 101, p. 101345, 2022.
J. H. and G. C.-C. G. Albort-Morant, “Advanced green innovations and organiza-tional carbon performance: A PLS-SEM evaluation,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 145, pp. 812–825, 2022.
A. , W. C. , T. M. , A. U. , & K. C. S. Tariq, “Organic user-generated content as a catalyst for green innovation,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 61, no. 102553, 2021.
S. U. R. and F. J. G.-R. S. Kraus, “Corporate social responsibility and carbon neu-trality: The mediating role of operational green innovations,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 138, pp. 210–222, 2022.
G. W. and L. Z. M. Tang, “Environmental expenditure, green innovation capability, and corporate sustainability disclosure,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 102, pp. 115–128, 2022.
C. Deegan, “Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental dis-closures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting,” Auditing & Accountability Jour-nal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 282–311, 2002.
C. H. , & P. D. M. Cho, “The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitima-cy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society,” Organizations and Society, vol. 32, no. 7–8, pp. 639–647, 2007.
J. M. , R.-D. L. , G.-Á. I. , & G.-S. I. M. Prado-Lorenzo, “Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in large world companies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 1194–1202, 2009.
E. M. , & T. M. W. Reid, “Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1157–1178, 2009.
Z. A. Khan and B. Nafees, “Static Trade-off theory or Pecking order theory which one suits best to the financial sector . Evidence from Pakistan .,” vol. 5, no. 23, pp. 131–141, 2013.
S. , R. S. U. , & G. F. J. S. Kraus, “Corporate social responsibility and environmen-tal performance: The mediating role of green innovation,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 120, pp. 592–602, 2020.
J. F. , & J. M. Henri, “Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance,” Accounting, Organizations and So-ciety, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 63–80, 2010.
G. , L.-M. A. , & C.-C. G. Albort-Morant, “The antecedent role of green innovation practices in environmental performance,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 4912–4917, 2016.
M. , W. G. , L. D. , & F. M. A. Tang, “Green innovation, environmental regulation, and firm performance,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 68, pp. 38–48, 2018.
J. F. , H. G. T. M. , R. C. M. , & S. M. Hair, “A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.).,” Sage Publications, 2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dewi Kirowati, I Made Suparta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.