Training the "Scaffolding Digital Storytelling" for Secondary Level English Teacher at Middle Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/saluspublica.v1i3.204Keywords:
Digital Storytelling, Training, ScaffoldingAbstract
The "Scaffolding Digital Storytelling" training program has undergone a comprehensive evaluation using a rigorous mixed-methods methodology, which includes both quantitative and qualitative assessments. The program demonstrated significant effectiveness in improving participants' comprehension and abilities in digital storytelling and scaffolding. An analysis of assessments conducted before and after training, with the use of statistical tests, revealed a noteworthy enhancement in knowledge and abilities within the experimental group. This underscores the success of the program. The qualitative findings provided more clarity on the participants' experiences, highlighting their active involvement, contentment, and effective incorporation of digital storytelling into their teaching methods. The program's favorable impact on pedagogical techniques was evidenced through observations, surveys, and analysis of lesson plans. The program's revolutionary power was further validated by notable success stories, such as those of HM, LF, and EB, which demonstrated its adaptability across different degrees of technological expertise. The use of digital storytelling in educational settings, as demonstrated by teachers like Sarah Thompson, RM, PK, and BS, highlights the long-lasting beneficial impacts on student involvement, linguistic aptitude, and analytical thinking abilities. Crucially, the program went beyond just one intervention and encouraged educators to continuously improve and adapt. In conclusion, the "Scaffolding Digital Storytelling" training program proves to be a powerful force for promoting positive transformation in both the skills of the participants and the methods of instruction. The significant influence it has on gaining knowledge, effectively incorporating it into teaching methods, and consistently improving student outcomes make it a powerful resource for enhancing language training using digital storytelling and scaffolding strategies.
References
P. Smagorinsky, “Deconflating the ZPD and instructional scaffolding: Retranslating and reconceiving the zone of proximal development as the zone of next development,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 16, no. October 2017, pp. 70–75, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.10.009.
P. Smagorinsky, C. M. Clayton, and L. L. Johnson, “Distributed Scaffolding in a Service-Learning Course,” Theory Pract., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2015, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2015.977665.
P. Smagorinsky, “The development of social and practical concepts in learning to teach: A synthesis and extension of Vygotsky’s conception,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 238–248, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.07.003.
K. Shabani, M. Khatib, and S. Ebadi, “Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers’ Professional Development,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 3, no. 4, 2010, doi: 10.5539/elt.v3n4p237.
P. E. Langford, Vygotsky’s developmental and educational psychology. 2005. doi: 10.4324/9780203499573.
J. van de Pol, M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen, “Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 271–296, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.
A. Bandura, “Social learning theory,” The Routledge Companion to Criminological Theory and Concepts. General Learning Press, New York, pp. 115–119, 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315744902-26.
K. K. Curum B, “Cognitive load management in mobile learning systems: principles and theories,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 109, 2021, doi: doi: 10.1007/s40692-020-00173-6. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
N. Khan and A. Ali, “Improving the speaking ability in English: The students’ perspective,” 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.554.
M. de la O. López Abeledo, “Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development,” Lang. Educ., 2008, doi: 10.2167/le127b.0.
J. Zipes, Speaking Out: Storytelling and creative drama for children. Twin Cities: University Minnesota, 2004.
A. Aly Anwar, “Reflections on Bloom ’ s Revised Taxonomy Aly Amer,” Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol., vol. 4 (1), no. 8, p. 213.230, 2006.
L. Khatib, Storytelling in World Cinemas: Contexts, vol. 1. 2013.
J. C. Dunn and C. Zimmer, “Self-determination theory,” Routledge Handb. Adapt. Phys. Educ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 296–312, 2020, doi: 10.4324/9780429052675-23.
S. B. Merriam, “Adult Learning Theory: Evolution and Future Directions,” PAACE J. Lifelong Learn., vol. 26, pp. 21–37, 2017.
Y. Yuniarti, R. Yulian, and Y. Yuniarti, “Digital Story Telling Based on Multimodal Elements on EFL Learners’ Speaking Performance,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 308–316, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i2.40217.
E. Wafa and N. Chakim, “the Use of Digital Storytelling To Enhance the Students’Speaking Ability,” … J. Int. J. Educ. …, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 168–176, 2022.
C. Dziuban, C. R. Graham, P. D. Moskal, A. Norberg, and N. Sicilia, “Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Delfia Herwanis, Rahmanita Zakaria, Erako Gayo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
