Procurement Tender Fairness: MSME, Business Competition Law, and SIKaP Application

Authors

  • Asmah Asmah Faculty of Law, Universitas Sawerigading, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v2i3.312

Keywords:

Business Competition Law, MSME, Procurement Tenders, SIKaP Application

Abstract

This study analyzes the right to justice in tenders for the procurement of goods and services for small business actors from the perspective of business competition law through the application of the SIKaP application. The research method used is qualitative analysis based on the available empirical analysis of the literature. The results of the literature analysis show that small business actors face challenges such as the non-transparency of the selection process, unfairness in evaluating proposals, non-neutral procurement, unfair competition, and constraints on access to information. SIKaP application is considered as a potential solution to increase fairness in procurement tenders, but challenges such as lack of understanding and awareness as well as technical obstacles still need to be overcome. The importance of the role of business competition law is also recognized in protecting the rights of small business actors. This study concludes that additional efforts are needed, including training and awareness, technological infrastructure improvements, and effective law enforcement, to ensure the successful implementation of the SIKaP application and the protection of small business actors' rights in procurement tenders. The results of this study make an important contribution in understanding the challenges and opportunities for small business actors in obtaining fairness in procurement tenders. The implications can be used as a basis for developing policies and actions that support fair participation and equal opportunities for small business actors.

References

A. Listiyanto, “Pembaharuan Regulasi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah,” J. Rechts Vinding Media Pembin. Huk. Nas., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 113, 2012, doi: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i1.109.

D. Subagyo and H. Purnomo, “Manajemen UMKM Berkelanjutan,” no. VIII, pp. 1–140, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Alamsyahbana/publication/369450339_Manajemen_UMKM_Berkelanjutan/links/641bc47166f8522c38c78a15/Manajemen-UMKM-Berkelanjutan.pdf#page=14

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2008,” no. 1, 2008.

A. S. Asbanu, Siki YA , Rosari, De Petrus, Adang Djaha, “Stakeholder Perception Of The Procurement Of Goods And Services At The Nusa Tenggara River Region II Office In 2020,” J. Governance, Tax. Audit., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2023.

J. A. Ba. Ambe M, Intaher , Weiss, “Exploring the procurement challenges in the South African Public Sector,” Public Procurement, Corrupt. Cris. Gov. Africa, pp. 73–92, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-63857-3_5.

D. S. Jones, “Public procurement in southeast asia: Challenge and reform,” J. Public Procure., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–33, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1108/JOPP-07-01-2007-B001.

B. Hazarika and P. Jena, “Public procurement in India: assessment of institutional mechanism, challenges, and reforms,” NIPFP Work. Pap., no. 204, pp. 1–32, 2017.

L. K. C. Chan, “Uncertainty and the neutrality of government financing policy,” J. Monet. Econ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351–372, Jan. 1983, doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(83)90024-7.

Asmah, “The role of business competition law in online business: A comparative study of United Kingdom and Indonesia,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2022.2142398.

A. Goto, “Innovation and Competition Policy,” Japanese Econ. Rev., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2008.00466.x.

U. Basoeky et al., Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital dalam Berbagai Aspek Kehidupan Masyarakat. Media Sains Indonesia, 2021.

A. Davila, M. Gupta, and R. J. Palmer, “Moving Procurement Systems to the Internet:: the Adoption and Use of E-Procurement Technology Models,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 11–23, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00155-X.

M. Fadhli et al., Manajemen Proyek Perangkat Lunak. Yayasan Kita Menulis. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=M7pQEAAAQBAJ

N. Archer, S. Wang, and C. Kang, “Barriers to the adoption of online supply chain solutions in small and medium enterprises,” Supply Chain Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2008, doi: 10.1108/13598540810850337.

A. R. Montazemi, “Factors affecting information satisfaction in the context of the small business environment,” MIS Q., vol. 2, pp. 239–256, 1988.

N. Sa’adah, “The Implementation of E-Procurement in Indonesia: Benefits, Risks, and Problems,” INFERENSI J. Penelit. Sos. Keagamaan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 283–304, 2020, doi: 10.18326/infsl3.v14i2.283-304.

B. Maagi and A. Mwakalobo, “Practitioners’ Perception of the Effect of E-Procurement Practices on Time Saving in Public Procurement in Tanzania,” OALib, vol. 10, no. 05, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1110075.

N. Van Gorp and O. Batura, “Challenges for Competition Policy in a Digitalised Economy,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., pp. 1–80, 2015.

A. Igogo, “the Factors Influencing Effective E-Procurement Use in Public Sectors the Case of Selected Higher Learning Institutions in Dar Es Salaam,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 201–211, 2023, doi: 10.47814/ijssrr.v6i7.1342.

Q. Alam and J. Pacher, “Impact of compulsory competitive tendering on the structure and performance of local government systems in the State of Victoria,” Public Adm. Dev., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 359–371, Dec. 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.146.

Downloads

Published

30-07-2024

How to Cite

Asmah, A. (2024). Procurement Tender Fairness: MSME, Business Competition Law, and SIKaP Application. Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society, 2(3), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v2i3.312

Issue

Section

Articles