Student Reasoning Based on Mathematical Ability in Solving HOTS Problems through Differentiated Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/athena.v2i1.232Keywords:
Differentiated Learning, HOTS Problems, ReasoningAbstract
The mathematical abilities of students with reasoning are closely interrelated. The HOTS-type problem is an effort to improve reasoning ability. The ability of students to solve HOTS questions is still relatively low. Through a differentiated learning model, it is expected to help students in the learning process that suits their needs. The purpose of this study is to describe the application of differentiated learning models and describe the mathematical reasoning ability of students who have low, medium, and high abilities. This type of research is qualitatively descriptive with instruments in the form of observation sheets, questionnaires, test questions and interviews. Data analysis techniques include data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. Test the validity of data using triangulation techniques. The results of this study show that differentiated learning can improve students' ability to reason. Four indicators of mathematical reasoning are, students' ability to present mathematical problems in the form of written statements, students' ability to make conjectures, students' ability to manipulate mathematics, and students' ability to draw conclusions from problems. Subjects with a high level of reasoning meet two indicators. Whereas subjects with moderate levels of reasoning met only three indicators and subjects with low levels of reasoning met only two indicators. Mathematics teachers should provide learning that is in accordance with the learning style of students and students should also do HOTS type questions more often.
References
K. Purwaningtyas, “Penalaran Siswa SMP Terhadap Soal Geometri Tipe HOTS Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika,” APOTEMA J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, hal. 95–102, 2019, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://194.59.165.171/index.php/APM/article/view/260.
R. D. Agustin, “Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Mahasiswa Melalui Pendekatan Problem Solving” J. Pendagogia, no. 2, hal. 179–188, 2016.
A. S. Rosyidah, E. Hidayanto, dan M. Muksar, “Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Geometri,” JIPM (Jurnal Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, hal. 268–283, 2021, doi: 10.25273/jipm.v10i2.8819.
Y. Ria dan D. Risalah, “Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Pada Materi Teorema Phytagoras Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Monterado,” J. Innov. Res. Knowledg, vol. 1, no. 5, hal. 767–772, 2021.
J. Olsson dan C. Granberg, “Teacher-Student Interaction Supporting Students’ Creative Mathematical Reasoning During Problem Solving Using Scratch,” Math. Think. Learn., vol. 00, no. 00, hal. 1–28, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10986065.2022.2105567.
I. W. E. Mahendra, I. G. A. N. T. Jayantika, dan N. W. R. Sulistyani, “HOTS-Speed Test untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Analisis Peserta didik,” AKSIOMA J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 1, hal. 93–101, 2019, doi: 10.26877/aks.v10i1.3772.
D. Amalia dan W. Hadi, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Hots Berdasarkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis,” Transform. J. Pendidik. Mat. dan Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, hal. 219–236, 2020, doi: 10.36526/tr.v4i1.904.
D. L. Nurina dan H. Retnawati, “Keefektifan Pembelajaran Menggunakan Pendekatan Problem Posing dan Pendekatan Open-Ended Ditinjau Dari HOTS,” PYTHAGORAS J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, hal. 129–136, 2015, doi: 10.21831/pg.v10i2.9128.
R. Noorbaiti, N. Fajriah, dan R. A. Sukmawati, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Visual-Auditori-Kinestetik (VAK) pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Kelas VII E MTsN Mulawarman Banjarmasin,” EDU-MAT J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 108–116, 2018, doi: 10.20527/edumat.v6i1.5130.
R. S. Utari dan D. Ulya, “Strategi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Materi Statistika,” Pros. NaCoME, hal. 123–131, 2019.
N. Fajriah, C. Utami, dan Mariyam, “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Statistika,” JERR J. Educ. Rev. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 14–24, 2020, doi: 10.31980/mosharafa.v10i3.1011.
Rahmawati dan A. Mujib, “Analisis Penalaran Statistika Berbasis Soal HOTS,” J. Math Educ. Nusant., vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 118–124, 2022.
S. Suryanti, C. Y. Sari, dan K. Kristiani, “Kesalahan Penyelesaian Soal Statistika Tipe High Order Thinking Skills Berdasarkan Teori Newman,” J. Tadris Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 207–218, 2020, doi: 10.21274/jtm.2020.3.2.207-218.
Z. Safarati, “Literature Review: Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi di Sekolah Menengah,” Genta Mulia J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. November, hal. 33–37, 2023.
A. Faiz, A. Pratama, dan I. Kurniawaty, “Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Program Guru Penggerak pada Modul 2.1,” J. basicedu, vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 524–532, 2022.
E. A. Cindyana, J. A. Alim, dan E. Noviana, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Berbantuan Materi Ajar Geometri Berbasis RME Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar,” J. PAJAR ( Pendidik. dan Pengajaran ), vol. 6, no. 4, hal. 1179–1187, 2022.
R. F. Azizah, Sunardi, dan D. Kurniati, “Penalaran Matematis dalam menyelesaikan PISA pada Siswa Usia 15 tahun di SM Negeri 1 Jember,” Kadikma, vol. 8, no. 1, hal. 97–104, 2017.
M. U. Gusteti dan Neviyarni, “Pembelajaran berdiferensiasi pada pembelajaran matematika di kurikulum merdeka,” Lebesgue J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat. Mat. dan Stat., vol. 3, no. 3, hal. 636–646, 2022.
R. T. Astria dan A. B. Kusuma, “Analisis Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis,” Prox. J. Penelit. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 6, no. 2, hal. 112–119, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dian Septi Nur Afifah Afifah, Nur Ika Fatmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
