Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society
https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/athena
<p class="isSelectedEnd"><strong>Athena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society</strong> is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access academic journal dedicated to advancing scholarly knowledge on social, cultural, and societal dynamics, with particular attention to the diversity of Indonesia and the broader Asian region. The journal provides an interdisciplinary platform for scholars, researchers, and practitioners to critically examine the complex relationships among culture, society, identity, institutions, communities, and processes of social transformation.</p> <p>Recognizing Indonesia as one of the world's most culturally, ethnically, linguistically, and socially diverse societies, <strong>Athena</strong> particularly welcomes research that explores local and indigenous knowledge, cultural heritage, social institutions, community practices, identity formation, multiculturalism, religion and society, gender relations, migration, social inequality, digital culture, and contemporary social change. The journal also encourages comparative and transnational studies that situate Indonesian experiences within Southeast Asian, Asian, and wider global contexts.</p>Media Digital Publikasi Indonesiaen-USAthena: Journal of Social, Culture and Society2985-3605The Codification of National-Cultural Stereotypes Through Etalons of Comparisons: A Contrastive Study of English and Karakalpak Languages
https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/athena/article/view/753
<p> This article examines the codification of national-cultural stereotypes through the etalons of comparison in English and Karakalpak linguocultures from a contrastive linguocultural perspective. Stable comparisons are regarded as one of the principal means of verbalizing culturally significant knowledge, since their figurative standards preserve and transmit the values, stereotypes, and worldview of a linguistic community. The study aims to identify the national-cultural specificity of comparison etalons and to determine their thematic distribution in both languages. The research is based on a corpus of <strong>600 English</strong> and <strong>1,000 Karakalpak</strong> stable comparisons extracted by continuous sampling from authoritative phraseological and explanatory dictionaries. The analysis employs descriptive, comparative, linguocultural, semantic, and quantitative-statistical methods. Following the thematic classification proposed by F. Usmanov, the comparisons were grouped into five categories: <strong>Fauna</strong><strong>, </strong><strong>Realities of Everyday Life</strong><strong>, </strong><strong>Phenomena and Elements of Nature</strong><strong>, </strong><strong>Flora</strong><strong>, </strong>and <strong>Folklore Characters</strong><strong>.</strong> The quantitative analysis demonstrates that fauna constitutes the most productive thematic source in both languages (35% in English and 32% in Karakalpak), confirming the universal cognitive role of animal imagery in conceptualizing human qualities. At the same time, Karakalpak comparisons show a higher frequency of ethnoculturally marked everyday realities and natural phenomena, reflecting the influence of nomadic traditions, the natural environment, and material culture. English comparisons reveal a greater tendency toward pragmatic and object-oriented conceptualization, emphasizing everyday experience and observable reality. Although both languages display similar cognitive models in the distribution of thematic groups, the internal semantic content of comparison etalons reflects distinct national-cultural values, historical experience, and cultural codes. The findings contribute to the development of contrastive phraseology, linguoculturology, cognitive linguistics, and intercultural communication by demonstrating how stable comparisons encode culturally specific stereotypes while simultaneously revealing universal mechanisms of figurative conceptualization.</p>Usenova Gulmira Abillaevna
Copyright (c) 2026 Usenova Gulmira Abillaevna
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-08-202026-08-204489690410.58905/athena.v4i4.753Teacher–Student Conflicts: Conflict Proneness, Perceived Causes, and An Empirical Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships
https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/athena/article/view/773
<p>Teacher–student relationships constitute one of the most influential determinants of students’ academic achievement, psychological well-being, and social adjustment. Conflicts emerging within these relationships may either hinder educational outcomes or serve as constructive opportunities for personal and academic development, depending on how they are managed. This study investigates the socio-psychological characteristics of teacher–student conflicts by integrating theoretical analysis with empirical evidence. Specifically, it examines students’ conflict proneness, perceived causes of teacher–student conflicts, and the relationship between conflict proneness and the quality of teacher–student relationships. Data were collected from 410 secondary school students (Grades 8–11) using N. V. Grishina’s Conflict Situation Diagnostics methodology. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation analysis were employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed that most participants demonstrated a moderate level of conflict proneness (56.8%), whereas 22.2% exhibited high conflict proneness. Communication barriers and mutual misunderstanding (34.9%), perceived unfairness in assessment (23.9%), and disagreements concerning disciplinary requirements (18.5%) emerged as the most frequently reported sources of conflict. Furthermore, a statistically significant negative correlation was identified between conflict proneness and the quality of teacher–student relationships (r = –0.52, p < .01). The findings emphasize the importance of strengthening teachers’ conflict management competence, empathic communication skills, and psychologically safe learning environments to foster constructive educational relationships.</p>Erkinov Muslimbek Mo'yiddin o'g'li
Copyright (c) 2026 Erkinov Muslimbek Mo'yiddin o'g'li
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-08-202026-08-204490591110.58905/athena.v4i4.773From Patrimonial Recognition to Hybrid State Decoration: A Phase Model of the Transformation of the Bukhara Emirate’s Award System, 1868–1920
https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/athena/article/view/780
<p>his article reconstructs the transformation of the award system of the Bukhara Emirate between the treaty settlement of 1868 and the abolition of the Emirate in 1920. Existing scholarship has established the inventory of Bukharan orders and medals but has treated the shift from traditional courtly recognition to European-style decorations largely as a descriptive sequence. The present study addresses three problems left open by that literature. First, it supplies an operational definition of “modernization” for award institutions, specifying seven testable criteria, and evaluates the Bukharan case against them; the system satisfies three criteria fully, two partially, and two not at all, which supports the narrower characterization of a form-led modernization without full institutional rationalization. Second, it distinguishes five mechanisms through which Russian influence could have operated and grades each against the surviving evidence; consultative reference to St Petersburg, dependence on Russian-mediated manufacture, and reciprocal diplomatic conferment are documented, whereas morphological resemblance and elite socialization remain inferential. The Emir’s enquiry of 16 June 1894 concerning decorations for women, and the negative response of the Russian ministries, is identified as the clearest documentary instance of imperial gatekeeping over Bukharan award policy. Third, the article proposes an explicit four-phase transformation model patrimonial recognition, post-treaty adjustment, institutional layering, and bureaucratic expansion and specifies the political mechanism driving each transition. A typology separating insignia of office, honorific investiture, diplomatic gifts, material remuneration, and formal decorations is introduced to replace the undifferentiated notion of a single “reward system,” and a twelve-dimension comparison with the Russian imperial order system is presented. The evidence indicates a recipient gradient in which the highest classes were directed outward toward the Russian imperial house and administration while the lower classes served internal functional constituencies, although the surviving corpus is itself biased toward Russian-held material and this asymmetry is stated as a pattern in the record rather than as a complete account of conferment practice.</p>Utkirov Abdulaziz Fakhriddin ugli
Copyright (c) 2026 Utkirov Abdulaziz Fakhriddin ugli
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-08-202026-08-204491292810.58905/athena.v4i4.780The Axiological Paradigm of National Ideology and Factors of Ideological Stability in the Context of Social Transformation: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis
https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/athena/article/view/790
<p>This article offers a socio-philosophical analysis of the axiological (value-based) paradigm of national ideology and of the factors that sustain ideological stability under conditions of accelerated social transformation, digitalization and globalization. Methodologically, the study combines a theoretical-analytical reading of classical and contemporary axiological sources, a comparative-axiological procedure for relating national and universal values, a phenomenological-hermeneutic reconstruction of value-consciousness and narrative identity, and a systemic-synergetic account of stability. Three results are reported. First, the value structure of national ideology is reconstructed as a three-tier hierarchy comprising existential-spiritual, historical-cultural and practical-social values, each with a distinct socio-philosophical function. Second, five factors of ideological stability are identified and specified: internal coherence of the value system, the presence of higher goals and existential meaning, the reflexive character of value-consciousness, the balance between personal interests and collective values, and the resilience of value continuity and cultural sovereignty. Third, the mechanisms through which these values are institutionally reproduced are described in terms of habitus and symbolic capital. The novelty of the study lies in conceptualizing national ideology not as a rigid dogmatic system but as a dynamic spiritual-value core with adaptive potential, capable of regulating socio-institutional practice and safeguarding cultural sovereignty in a hyper-connected information society.</p>Barno Matchanova
Copyright (c) 2026 Barno Matchanova
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-08-282026-08-284492993310.58905/athena.v4i4.790The Transformation from Classical Nationalism to Green Nationalism
https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/athena/article/view/799
<p>The climate crisis has created a context in which established nationalist categories are increasingly articulated through ecological concerns. This article examines how national identity, homeland/territory, sovereignty, national interest, development, security, citizenship, temporal horizons, and international relations are reconfigured in contemporary green-nationalist scholarship. Using theory-guided qualitative document analysis, this study draws on foundational nationalism scholarship and contemporary research on nationalism, environmentalism, and climate politics. The analysis identifies three substantive green-nationalist configurations—inclusive-civic, developmental-technological, and exclusionary-ecological—and distinguishes institutional forms, hybrid combinations, and symbolic greening as analytically distinct categories. The article argues that green nationalism should not be understood as the inevitable successor to classical nationalism but as a conditional ecological rearticulation of nationalist categories, shaped by identity structures, political institutions, economic and energy interests, climate vulnerability, and international pressures. By separating classification from ecological evaluation, the proposed framework provides a basis for comparing competing forms of green nationalism and for testing their emergence and consequences in future empirical research.</p>Abdullah AydınFiliz Kutluay TutarAbdallah Abukalloub
Copyright (c) 1970 Abdallah Abukalloub
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
2026-09-182026-09-184493494310.58905/athena.v4i4.799